Director: Terence Daw
Writer: Terence Daw
Producers: Malcolm Kohll, David Pupkewitz
Cast: Billy Zane, Natalie Mendoza, Christina Cole
Country: UK/South Africa
Year of release: 2009
Reviewed from: screener DVD
Surviving Evil may be the first horror film directed by someone who has previously helmed episodes of Heartbeat. Unfortunately, the result is what you might expect. The first hour or so, which is all lightweight character drama and soap opera relationships, is competently directed and quite interesting - but when it eventually gets round to the horror stuff it just falls apart, losing all the interest it may have built up amongst its audience.
Billy Zane (Titanic, Bloodrayne etc. - you know who Billy Zane is) stars as Seb Beazly, a professional adventurer filming the 183rd edition of his TV series Surviving the Wilderness on a remote island in the Philippines. With him are his producer/director Rachel (Louise Barnes: Borderline), cameraman Dex (Colin Moss: Cryptid) and sound recordist Phoebe (Christina Cole: bus driver Candy in Doghouse). The soap angle is that Dex and Rachel were once an item and she still carries a torch which flares up when she sees him coming on (entirely reasonably) to hot tropical babe Cecilia, one of two Filipinos in the party. (Cecilia is played by Natalie Mendoza, from The Descent, who does actually have Filipino parents.)
The last member of this sextette is Joey (Joel Torre, an honest to God Filipino character actor whose horror credits include Yanggaw, Sapi and Sa Ilalim ng Cogon) who doubles as guide and armed guard and is the only person to have visited this island before. Cecilia fills in as assistant guide and general PA. The boatman who takes them to the island refuses to stay but will return in six days. The group have two satellite phones which allow them intermittent contact with ‘base’.
There is one village on this island which is presumably the one we saw in a prologue being attacked by something savage while a woman gave birth during a thunderstorm. When Joey goes to make contact with the villagers he finds the place deserted, something which he keeps secret from the others although there is no indication of how he explains this lack of communication as presumably they were expecting something to come from his visit.
A few odd things happen. Phoebe thinks she sees a sad old woman standing still near the camp who has disappeared when she looks again. Playing back footage, Dex notices what appears to be a human figure climbing a tree in the background of one shot but dismisses it as it doesn’t spoil the shot. And a blackened skeletal hand falls from a tree onto Rachel while she is trying to take a dump in the woods.
All the rotting remains in this film are black and skeletal, looking like they have been burned rather than rotted away, but still with splashes of unnaturally bright red blood. These include several bodies in the village and a dead baby which lands in Phoebe’s lap.
Anyway, let’s get to the meat. The big selling point of this film, at least as far as I’m concerned. Joey and Cecilia become convinced that the island is home to an aswang.
An aswang, folks! This is an honest-to-God British aswang film! Who would ever have thought such a thing possible?
Actually, it’s not really a British film except for tax purposes. It was shot entirely in Durban - in May 2008 - with some post-production in the USA and the Philippines (which, with the possible exception of some stock jungle footage, is the closest the film ever gets to Manila). But the opening titles proclaim Surviving Evil to be ‘A UK/South Africa co-production’ and so it is. Even though the only recognisable name among 13(!) executive producers is American B-movie legend Chuck Fries.
But it is at least a proper aswang film. Just about.
One of the things that distinguishes the aswang among monsters is that it preys on pregnant woman - and guess who has just missed her period after a one-off drunken fumble with Seb? That’s right, it’s Phoebe.
Meanwhile Joey has his own subplot. He needs money because his wife is gravely ill and he has returned to the island, not just for the job as guide, but because he knows the location of a derelict World War 2 outpost constructed during the Japanese occupation. And what do all stories that touch on the Japanese occupation of the Philippines revolve around? Got it in one!
Joey seems to have no clear evidence that there is gold in the outpost but he also seems fairly sure it is there. He has a hand-drawn cloth map but there’s no indication of where he got it; he may even have drawn it himself on his last visit. But he also tells Cecilia, when she follows him to the outpost, that she can return to camp by just heading due south. So, you know, the map’s not really necessary.
It is while Joey is deep underground, in a cavernous vault beneath this jungle outpost, that we get our first clear look at the aswangs. For there are several. And it honestly is one of the most cack-handed monster reveals I’ve ever seen. A couple of them just appear and start threatening Cecilia but there’s no build-up, no follow-through, no surprise. It looks like it’s been cut together as a best-we-can-do job after a bunch of shots either weren’t filmed or got screwed up.
But we do at last get to see some aswangs - and what a disappointment. Your aswang is a sort of Filipino vampire thing, a mysterious, fantastical creature of the night, it’s super-long tongue ready to suck the life from any unborn foetus. It’s weird and terrifying. These aswangs are basically pitch-black, ferocious, animalistic men, growling and jumping around and holding their clawed hands up in a scary fashion. Grrrr! I’m an aswang! I’m sorry but they’re about as scary as the Pathetic Sharks in Viz. They’re the Pathetic Aswangs.
According to Joey there are three things we must all know about aswangs, apart from them being so scary and dangerous and all. One is the whole pregnant women schtick, one is that they can’t go underground(?) - which leads to Dex suggesting they dig a trench to protect themselves but by that time they’ve got no spade, Phoebe is in hysterics and Seb is incapacitated after one of the aswangs bit him on the arm when he was up a tree trying to photograph a macaque.
The other thing is... they’re shape-shifters.
Which sounds great but, as might be expected by the more cynical viewers, this whole shape-shifting thing is largely irrelevant and not really featured to any great degree. There is one short sequence on the beach when a couple of aswangs are portrayed by a pair of alsatian dogs and there is the climax when a whole bunch of them suddenly sprout bat-wings and soar off like so many flying monkeys to their tree-top eyrie. That’s pretty much your lot.
I won’t spoil the film by describing who survives or how (or why) or the rather curious epilogue which is probably meant to be unsettling and unnerving but just comes across as unclear and undecided. I’ll just observe that the movie takes a very, very long time to get going and, when it does, it falls apart. A big disappointment.
Writer-director Terence Daw has a track record on some of British TV’s blandest and dullest series: Heartbeat, Emmerdale, The Bill. To be fair, the guy’s got to earn a living and not everyone can direct Doctor Who (and until that came back, there simply wasn’t anything interesting or exciting being made in the UK). But this lack of experience in the fantastique shows itself in Surviving Evil where, as mentioned, the character stuff is fine but the action-horror stuff just doesn’t work. Daw has also directed kids shows, arts shows, documentaries and a Ravi Shankar concert film.
His self-penned biography on IMDB mentions a whole bunch of feature scripts that he has written and sold. I actually feel quite sorry for the guy because he clearly had high hopes for Surviving Evil and maybe saw it as a route out of soap opera purgatory. Maybe he can still make it.
Among the small army of executive producer are several who worked on Book of Blood and/or Chemical Wedding. DP Mike Downie is one of South Africa’s most prolific cinematographers with credits ranging from Boer War documentaries to the Johannesburg version of Pop Idol, plus loads of feature films, shorts and TV (including season one of Ed Naha’s series The Adventures of Sinbad).
Tom Kane, who shares music credit with Colin Baldry, has a couple of interesting British horror shorts on his CV include E’gad Zombies! and a version of The Tell Tale Heart. Editor Adam Recht cut that weird 2006 BBC version of Dracula plus episodes of Bonekickers, Primeval, Hex and the Prisoner remake. Brendan Lonergan (Blood + Roses) designed the creatures.
Released theatrically in South Africa, Surviving Evil had a token UK theatrical release in one cinema in Manchester (probably a contractual requirement). It played successfully in the Philipines. But then it would, wouldn’t it.
I really, really wanted to enjoy Surviving Evil more than I did. It’s a British aswang film ferchrissake! But it didn’t grip me, it didn’t scare me and, while the characters are well-rounded and sympathetic, I wanted to come out of the cinema whistling the monsters. And I didn’t.
MJS rating: C
Review originally posted 29th March 2010
MJ Simpson presents: the longest-running single-author film site on the web, est.2002.
Saturday, 24 January 2015
Thursday, 22 January 2015
Goblin?
Director: Christian James
Writer: Matt Brothers
Producer: Emma Biggins
Cast: Holliday Grainger, David Oakes
Country: UK
Year of release: 2014
Reviewed from: Distrify (see end of review)
Goblin? (with a question mark in the title) is a fun little seven-minute short directed by Christian James of Freak Out and Stalled fame, and produced by Emma Biggins (The Harsh Light of Day). It premiered at Frightfest 2014 before being put onto Distrify, from where all profits go to the splendid folks at the British Lung Foundation and their essential work into assorted respiratory diseases.
Holliday Grainger (Where the Heart Is, Johnny and the Bomb, Demons) is Liz, a woman who comes home from work to find her house apparently ransacked. The place is a tip, items are strew everywhere, furniture is damaged, there are some curious scratches on the walls. Cautiously, she creeps upstairs calling for her (unemployed, stay-at-home) boyfriend Harry (David Oakes: Truth or Dare, The Borgias). She finds him in the bedroom where he assures her that he has done battle with a goblin and has managed to lock it in the wardrobe. The script by Matt Brothers (whose various shorts include 2011 quickie Absence, also directed by Christian James) then becomes a sparkling slice of dialogue as the two proceed to argue over the existence, or otherwise, of said goblin. Hence the question mark.
Structurally, this is a Monty Python sketch, which is not to say that this is a Pythonesque comedy. Though it is very funny. What I mean is that the classic Python set-up is someone sensible arguing with someone else over a subject which should really be beyond argument. The parrot is obviously dead. You obviously don’t need a licence for a pet fish. The cheese shop obviously has no cheese in it. And, by the same token, there clearly isn’t a goblin in the wardrobe.
But Liz is prepared to argue with Harry, justifying her dismissal of his claim, rather than actually just dismissing it. It's a cracking performance from both actors. The ending is, shall we say, not unexpected but none the worse for that.
The other thing that really impresses about this short film is the set dressing. Both floors of the house used for the location have been thoroughly (albeit artistically) trashed. It actually takes a great deal of effort to make somewhere look like it’s been messed up: the impression of chaos is hard to create (without real chaos – and even then it often looks fake). So kudos to production designer Erik Rehl (The Machine) and art director Alex Woodward (Doctor Who).
An all-star crew of BHR names includes cinematography by Luke Bryant (UFO, Allies, Writers Retreat, Kill Keith), editing by Mark Gilleece (Stalled), make-up by Lauren Gregory (Stalled, Night Surf), VFX by Thomas Saville (Small Town Folk, Mutant Chronicles, Territory), music by Adam Langston (Dead Wood, The First Zombie) and sound recording by Glen Yard (Freak Out, The Witches Hammer, Bordello Death Tales, Zombie Resurrection, K-Shop and more). Harsh Light of Day director Oliver Milburn is tucked in at the tail end of the credits as colourist.
Goblin? was shot in a single day in July 2013 in producer Emma's own house which presumably generally looks a bit tidier than it does here. Now, for just a quid, which goes to an important medical charity, you can watch it on Distrify, Seven minutes well spent.
MJS Rating: A-
Writer: Matt Brothers
Producer: Emma Biggins
Cast: Holliday Grainger, David Oakes
Country: UK
Year of release: 2014
Reviewed from: Distrify (see end of review)
Goblin? (with a question mark in the title) is a fun little seven-minute short directed by Christian James of Freak Out and Stalled fame, and produced by Emma Biggins (The Harsh Light of Day). It premiered at Frightfest 2014 before being put onto Distrify, from where all profits go to the splendid folks at the British Lung Foundation and their essential work into assorted respiratory diseases.
Holliday Grainger (Where the Heart Is, Johnny and the Bomb, Demons) is Liz, a woman who comes home from work to find her house apparently ransacked. The place is a tip, items are strew everywhere, furniture is damaged, there are some curious scratches on the walls. Cautiously, she creeps upstairs calling for her (unemployed, stay-at-home) boyfriend Harry (David Oakes: Truth or Dare, The Borgias). She finds him in the bedroom where he assures her that he has done battle with a goblin and has managed to lock it in the wardrobe. The script by Matt Brothers (whose various shorts include 2011 quickie Absence, also directed by Christian James) then becomes a sparkling slice of dialogue as the two proceed to argue over the existence, or otherwise, of said goblin. Hence the question mark.
Structurally, this is a Monty Python sketch, which is not to say that this is a Pythonesque comedy. Though it is very funny. What I mean is that the classic Python set-up is someone sensible arguing with someone else over a subject which should really be beyond argument. The parrot is obviously dead. You obviously don’t need a licence for a pet fish. The cheese shop obviously has no cheese in it. And, by the same token, there clearly isn’t a goblin in the wardrobe.But Liz is prepared to argue with Harry, justifying her dismissal of his claim, rather than actually just dismissing it. It's a cracking performance from both actors. The ending is, shall we say, not unexpected but none the worse for that.
The other thing that really impresses about this short film is the set dressing. Both floors of the house used for the location have been thoroughly (albeit artistically) trashed. It actually takes a great deal of effort to make somewhere look like it’s been messed up: the impression of chaos is hard to create (without real chaos – and even then it often looks fake). So kudos to production designer Erik Rehl (The Machine) and art director Alex Woodward (Doctor Who).
An all-star crew of BHR names includes cinematography by Luke Bryant (UFO, Allies, Writers Retreat, Kill Keith), editing by Mark Gilleece (Stalled), make-up by Lauren Gregory (Stalled, Night Surf), VFX by Thomas Saville (Small Town Folk, Mutant Chronicles, Territory), music by Adam Langston (Dead Wood, The First Zombie) and sound recording by Glen Yard (Freak Out, The Witches Hammer, Bordello Death Tales, Zombie Resurrection, K-Shop and more). Harsh Light of Day director Oliver Milburn is tucked in at the tail end of the credits as colourist.
Goblin? was shot in a single day in July 2013 in producer Emma's own house which presumably generally looks a bit tidier than it does here. Now, for just a quid, which goes to an important medical charity, you can watch it on Distrify, Seven minutes well spent.
MJS Rating: A-
Stag Hunt
Writers: James Shanks, Neil Craske
Producer: Neil Craske
Cast: Mackenzie Astin, Neil Cole, Donald Morrison, Chris Rogers
Country: UK
Year of release: 2015
Reviewed from: online screener
Way back in the mid-1990s I travelled, with my SFX Staff Writer hat on, down to Shepperton. Not to visit the film studios but to spend some time in a pokey recording studio above a hairdresser where I bore witness to a possibly unique event. The dubbing, in Britain, by British actors, of a Japanese kaiju movie.
Traditionally, Godzilla movies and other kaiju eiga were dubbed into English in Japan by a bunch of westerners, most of them just part-time actors who already had proper jobs but knew someone at Toho or Toei. These ‘international versions’ were trade-screened and shown at festivals, but often the US distributor would want more professional, American-sounding voices and record their own dubs. So there was often a difference between the British and American release of a film: we got the international version, they did their own.
Flash forward a considerable number of years to the first really, really good kaiju eiga for ages, the film that in many ways revitalised the genre: Shusuke Kaneko’s Gamera: Guardian of the Universe. This did great stuff at festivals – deservedly so – and Manga Video decided they would take a punt and release it into UK cinemas ahead of its video release, the first theatrical outing for a giant Japanese monster on these shores in 20 years (we never got any of the 1980s/1990s Godzilla pictures). But Manga (who mostly released anime but put out a few live action titles like Zeram) decided that they wanted a different dub, a British dub. And that was why I was in Shepperton on that sunny afternoon.
While there, I was shown some footage of an unfinished British horror film which the dubbing director was also working on. It featured Brian Blessed and Julie T Wallace and looked amazing. Remember: this was the mid-1990s. There was, like, nothing getting made in this country. At all.
For years afterwards I remembered seeing that footage. But I couldn’t remember the title, or the director’s name, and it wasn’t on the IMDB, and I had lost contact with the guy who had arranged the trip to the dubbing session. But I knew that, long before British horror was reborn in the 20th century, there had been a supernatural horror film – certainly started, possibly finished – with Brian Blessed and Julie T Wallace.
(I also knew that Gamera: Guardian of the Universe had had a UK theatrical release with a different soundtrack to the American version. Which few other people knew because the release was a flop. Manga decided to aim for the same weekend in July as The Lost World: Jurassic Park, confidant that Gamera could be the second-highest opener because every other distributor was keeping well away from that tentpole release. In the end, I’m not sure anyone actually watched the film except me and Kim Newman, and we both got in for free.)
Anyway, eventually that mysterious lost British horror film surfaced - in the mid-naughties ten years after it was made - on both sides of the Atlantic. It turned out to be called The Devil’s Harvest, although the UK distributor decided that it would sell better as Don’t Go in the Attic. Truth be told, it’s not a bad little film. It has its good points and its bad points but, as I observed in one of my favourite sentences in Urban Terrors: “any film which starts with Brian Blessed shouting in Latin can’t be all bad.” In the wake of Urban Terrors I kept in touch with the director, James Shanks, and now here comes his long-awaited second feature, Stag Hunt.
And here, after that little nostalgic ramble, comes the long-awaited review.
Stag Hunt slots into the micro-genre of ‘British horror movies about stag weekends’ which also includes Simon Cathcart’s Stag Knight and Andrew Jones’ Stag Night of the Dead. It also falls into the ‘male bonding out of town’ subgenre where examples would include Doghouse, The Scar Crow and Bicycle Day. Finally, one could include this in a list of rural horrors set in Britain but away from civilisation.
The set-up is this: likeable American ex-pat Spencer (Mackenzie Astin) is about to get hitched so has headed to Dartmoor for a weekend of hiking, drinking and larks with his two flatmates: immature English knobhead Pete (Neil Cole) and taciturn, practical Scot Jason (Donald Morrison). Pete is Spencer’s fiancee’s ex. Also along for the trip is her unfit, unprepared brother Andy (Chris Rogers).
Funny things, stag nights. I don’t think I had one and I’m not even sure I’ve ever been on one, although in my youth I did go on a number of hen nights which were very enjoyable (but that’s another story). I’m all for a final piss-up with one’s chums but of all the places and activities available – Brighton, Blackpool, Prague, paintball, shooting zombies with ray guns – hiking on Dartmoor seems to be a very odd choice indeed. Still, off they go.
As well as being a cracking rural horror-thriller, Stag Hunt is very funny. And its strength in this regard is that it is in no way a spoof, or wacky. The very best horror-comedy hybrids – like Shaun of the Dead or An American Werewolf in London – manage to somehow combine the two genres without lessening either. In either of those examples, you could remove the comedy and still have a very effective horror film. Or indeed you could remove the horror and have a very effective comedy. Stag Hunt manages this also. All the humour comes from believable situations and reactions and dialogue, not from artificially injected comedy ideas.
There’s a certain amount of larking about, some joshing between mates (which on occasion goes too far: there is no love lost between Pete and Andy) and some dry wit. It’s always a pleasure to watch films where the characters are at least reasonably intelligent. Yes, they like a beer and a joke and even the odd spliff. Yes, Pete isn’t nearly as funny as he thinks he is. But these are four reasonable, intelligent blokes that you would be happy to share a pint with. They actually have conversations about things – and you would be amazed how many horror films cannot tick that really simple box.
If there’s a problem here, it’s the same one that I identified when reviewing The Apostate, which is that though the film is very good it takes a long time to get going. About half an hour into this 93-minute feature comes the first clue that there might be something else out on the moors. And then it’s back to more hiking and joshing so that we’re only just short of the midpoint when the action kicks in.
That said, when it does kick in, it kicks in with a size 14 boot and doesn’t let up. There is indeed something else out on the moors. Something large and ferocious (and, since you’re wondering, non-supernatural – it’s not a werewolf). How our four likely lads deal with this threat in their isolated situation forms the second half of the film. And though there are still some wonderful moments of humour, the threat is never presented as anything less than potentially deadly. As they struggle to avoid it, then stand up to it, then fight back, the foursome realise things about themselves. Not great revelations, just real character development. Fine writing, delivered through fine performances. Top stuff.
In a film like this, casting is key and Jim Shanks has picked a quartet of actors who exhibit real on-screen chemistry together. You can believe they’re mates, you can believe that Pete and Andy don’t get on, you can believe they’d spend a stag weekend hiking across Dartmoor (though that still seems a freaking pointless thing to do if you ask me). Aside from a few people seen briefly in a pub near the start, there are no other characters. In a lovely touch the barmaid is Julie T Wallace, reprising her character from The Devil’s Harvest.
Mackenzie Astin may not have obvious 'Token Yank' name value but that’s fine because that’s not why he was cast. What he does have is a filmography stretching back to the 1980s when he was a child actor in an I Dream of Jeannie reunion telemovie and a Facts of Life spin-off. As an adult he has been in episodes of The Outer Limits, Lost, House, My Name is Earl, Grey’s Anatomy, NCIS and Bones, not to mention the US versions of Shameless and Prime Suspect. Despite his many credits, Astin hasn’t previously appeared in a horror film, if we exclude trying-too-hard comedy short Zombeo and Juliecula. But if there’s one credit that will haunt the poor man forever, I fear. It’s a starring role in a theatrically released feature that he made in his teens. Have you ever had the misfortune to see The Garbage Pail Kids Movie? Yes, that was Mackenzie Astin as Dodger, the boy who befriends them. Wow.
Moving on, Neil Cole’s previous horror credit was Howl, not the Paul Hyett movie but a 2013 short directed by Jamie Sims. As well as acting, he does stand-up and has a bunch of TV presenting credits including loads of motorsport commentaries. Chris Rogers has done a bit of film and TV but mostly stage including a fair amount of Shakespeare. Donald Morrison was in vampire web-series Judas Goat.
Jim co-wrote the script with his mate Neil Craske, who was co-producer (among other credits) on Devil’s Harvest and served as producer here. Jim also DPed, Neil also edited (and was sound designer). The suitably gruesome and realistic make-up effects are the work of Joe Fathers, director of classic documentary A History of Swanscombe, and their after-effects in an epilogue are courtesy of Alexandra Ellison. Visual effects are credited to Chris Harvey John of Harvey House Films. The beast itself, of which we sensibly see very, very little, was built by Animated Extras, an effects house whose previous BHR credits include Piggy, Dorian Gray, Shaun of the Dead and It’s a Wonderful Afterlife, plus lots of high profile, big budget stuff. The soundtrack is a mixture of music by Edward Bradshaw (13Hrs) and songs by Mark Underwood (who is also an actor and had a bit part in Truth or Dare).
Shot over two weeks in October 2011 (the copyright date is 2013, first screeners went out early 2015), Stag Hunt came in at under £20,000 of which about a quarter went on the barely glimpsed (but vital) animal antagonist. The photography shows off Dartmoor very well, as it happens, and the sound mix is good although the ADR betrays itself in a few sequences clearly shot in very windy locations.
It’s a real delight to finally have another film from James Shanks. Stag Hunt is a finely judged character comedy which morphs skilfully into a tense horror-thriller without ever losing its comic touch. Good work all round.
MJS rating: A-
Monday, 19 January 2015
The Haunting of Radcliffe House
Director: Nick Willing
Writer: Nick Willing
Producer: Michele Camarda
Cast: Olivia Williams, Matthew Modine, Antonia Clarke
Country: UK
Year of release: 2014
Reviewed from: TV screening
The Haunting of Radcliffe House is a curious film with an interesting history, and no-one else seems bothered about reviewing it so I guess it’s up to Muggins here. The film has its good points and its bad points. It’s not as awful as one might suppose from reading user reviews on the IMDB but nor is it as good as it could (or should) have been.
Olivia Williams (X-Men 3, Last Days on Mars) and token Yank Matthew Modine are Meg and Alec, a London couple who move into a vast, empty mansion on the Yorkshire moors. Meg has got the job of restoring this pile for an American client who has recently purchased it. Alec is an artist whose style mostly involves welding square lumps of metal together; he can use part of the building as a workshop. Also moving in are teenage daughter Penny (Antonia Clarke: The Thirteenth Tale) and not-quite-teen son Harper (Adam Thomas Wright: The Awakening).
Locals believe the house to be haunted, or cursed, or something. Local builder Donnelly (Jonathan Jaynes) agrees to help Meg with the fixer-upping but leaves when they discover an occult painting on the floor of a curious, slightly pyramidal room somewhere up on the top floor.
Fairly swiftly, spooky stuff starts happening. Penny receives a genuinely frightening visit from a ghost woman who runs towards her as the girl lies in bed, frozen with fear. Alec cuts himself on a nail and a drop of his blood is absorbed by the house. He starts making artistic sketches of a woman who may or may not be supposed to be Meg, and becomes increasingly obsessed with the artistic possibilities of blood. A ‘ghost whisperer’ (Sightseers’ Steve Oram) contacted online by Penny visits briefly and has psychic flashbacks to an accident involving a garden ornament that was broken but has been restored to its former location.
The good thing about The Haunting of Radcliffe House is that many of the scary bits are genuinely scary. Unlike the mediocre, over-rated Woman in Black (which seems to have kickstarted a renaissance in British ghost films) this does not rely on cheap cat scares. The ghost here is much more frightening than Hammer’s because it doesn’t just lunge screaming at the camera on a regular basis.
Where the film falls down however – and it’s a big tumble – is that there is no logic or coherence to any of the supernatural shenanigans on display. It’s like writer-director Nick Willing just got carried away when writing the script – ooh, and then this scary thing happens, then this – quite forgetting that he was supposed to be crafting a coherent narrative. In a way, that actually helps because each new scare is unexpected and, in its novelty, adds another layer of fright. Something you don’t get if each new scare is the same as the last. But that is offset by the completely random nature of what we see. In the third act for example, Penny gets trapped in a network of previously unmentioned cellars and is stalked by something human running fast on all fours, which is never explained. A little later, Penny and Harper find themselves out on the moors where they come across an artist’s easel with a painting of them, dressed exactly as they currently are. That’s spooky, I’ll grant you, but it doesn’t relate to anything before or after.
The activities of a ghost in a ghost story need to serve a purpose: a warning, or a cry for help, or a lamentation. The underlying story here is that the owner of Radcliffe House in the mid-19th century was an artist who murdered his wife, and was also a ‘Rosicrucian’ (though quite what that means in this context is neither explored nor explained). But there also seems to have been an accidental death of someone else falling from an upstairs window onto the garden ornament. The ghost of this person turns up in dayight although it only later becomes clear to us and Meg that this was indeed a Victorian ghost, despite wearing modern clothes.
There’s just no clear story here. The ghost’s activities and motivation are all over the place. There’s some talk of transferral of souls and Alec is clearly possessed by something. I think he is under the spell of the former owner (presumably as a result of that minor accident with a nail) and is trying to somehow transfer his dead wife’s soul into Meg. But why would he want to do that if he killed her in the first place? And where does this other ghost fit into it all? The whole thing is just a random grab-bag of (admittedly effective) spookiness masquerading as a (thoroughly unsatisfying) story.
Matters are not helped by some careless lack of attention to detail. At one point a phone in a room full of clutter starts ringing, although we know that the engineer who was supposed to reconnect the phone didn’t turn up. Spooky. Problem is: the phone is very clearly a 1980s Trimphone which is completely out of context with the other junk. More to the point, the foley artist on this film is presumably not old enough to remember Trimphones and their very, very distinctive sound so has added a standard ‘telephone ring’ sound effect. I don’t care if the caller is some spirit using an unplugged phone: either use a Trimphone sound or a pre-1980s phone prop. (While I’m being pedantic, there’s a scene where Harper and Jenny play Cluedo, which you can’t actually do with just two people.)
Eventually Meg is left lying on the painting underneath a weird, heavy, hanging metal thing that drips blood onto her. There is no explanation or context for this metal thing and, apart from hoping that it won’t pull its rusty bracket from the ceiling and squish the woman’s head, there’s very little reason to feel any concern, empathy or involvement in this scene.
And then there’s the ‘twist’ ending of the film. This is so bad, so unnecessary, so clichéed, so ineptly, unsubtly handled, and generally so stupid that it completely ruins the whole movie, hammering the final nail into something which up to then had been merely ‘not very good’.
The motive force behind The Haunting of Radcliffe House were married couple writer-director Nick Willing and producer Michele Camarda, whose previous BHR entry was 2002 misfire Doctor Sleep aka Hypnotic aka Close Your Eyes. Willing has also directed several mini-series for Hallmark, the two head honchos of which, Robert Halmi Sr and Jr, are credited here as executive producers. But this is a long way from a lavish Hallmark production, being principally funded by Screen Yorkshire. Presumably that funding body was keen to include as many establishing shots of tourist-friendly moorland as possible, and to overlook the film’s underlying message which is: stay away from Yorkshire, our ghosts will try to kill you and your children.
The film was shot in early 2014 under the half-hearted and pointless title Altar. There are a couple of mentions of an altar but there isn’t actually an altar in the film, unless that term refers to the circular floor painting, which isn’t any sort of altar that I would recognise. This was supposedly made with expectation of a theatrical release, but only in the sense that every film bullshits that line. Realistically, Altar was always going to be a straight-to-DVD picture – and hey, there’s no sin in that. But what actually happened was that Channel 5 bought the UK rights, improved the title considerably by changing it to The Haunting of Radcliffe House, and screened the film on terrestrial TV a couple of days after Christmas 2014.
In September that year a Kickstarter campaign was launched, presumably by Willing and Camarda, to raise $40,000 to pay for the film (as Altar) to get a theatrical release in the States. Despite reaching its target in under two months, it’s not clear what that money will pay for because at time of writing (mid-January 2015) the film was still listed on Amazon for a US DVD release in mid-Feb (through a distributor called Cinedigm, and with a truly abysmal sleeve). In any case, even if the film does get to play US theatres I can't see it getting a better response from audiences than it got on British TV.
Willing and Camarda don’t seem to have much luck with distribution. Thirteen years on, Doctor Sleep remains solidly unreleased in the UK under any of its varied titles, Amazon.co.uk offering only American, German and Danish discs. More to the point, one can’t help thinking that if savvy, successful film businessmen like Halmi pere et fils don’t think that a movie is worth backing as a theatrical release, then it’s probably not a sound investment on the part of crowdfunders, most of whom are presumably just really big fans of Modine or Williams.
Reading through the various comments on the IMDB of those who watched Radcliffe House over Christmas, there are numerous accusations of plagiarism: everything from The Shining to The Woman in Black (hey, I just got it: 'Radcliffe' House...) to Hellraiser. Truth be told, I don’t believe Willing set out to deliberately ape well-known horror movies, rather I suspect this is just a side effect of the film’s lack of originality. In randomly bolting together a whole pile of horror film clichés, devoid of the narrative context that might justify them, he has created an effective ‘greatest hits’ package of the genre. And it is natural that in making individual comparisons, the original and/or best known examples of each idea will spring to mind. So yes, a father takes his family to a remote building and then goes nuts but I don’t think Willing watched The Shining and went, “Yes, that’s what I’ll do.” More likely his thought process was: “Lots of horror films feature someone going nuts and threatening their family, often in an isolated setting – that will do me.”
One comparison that is worthy of note – and must be deliberate - is that the film’s basic premise is apparently very similar to ‘The Prayer Tree’, the two-part story which constituted Season 4 of BBC paranormal series Sea of Souls. “When a young couple, Karen and Ian O'Rourke, move into an old home they discover unique symbols painted on the walls. When they post the image on the Internet, Dr. Douglas Monaghan believes they have found the Tree of Life, a symbol of the Order of the Golden Dawn, a 19th century spiritualist group.” - is how the IMDB sums that up.
‘The Prayer Tree’ was written, like most Sea of Souls episodes, by David Kane. Nick Willing directed two episodes in the first season of that series, and Kane wrote the screenplay for Willing’s 2006 Anglo-Canadian thriller The River King. According to the IMDB he also gets a ‘thank you’ on Doctor Sleep. So clearly there is some connection there, but what it is I couldn’t say (and, truth be told, don’t really care).
Perhaps if Kane had written the script for Altar the film might have actually had a plot that made sense. As it is, Willing’s direction is pretty good and he uses a lot of different effects to create his spooky atmosphere, plus the cast are generally fine with particularly impressive performances from Clarke and Knight, but none of this can save the film from its fundamental problem which is simply incoherence and randomness. Things are just thrown into the mix for no reason and to no effect.
For example, at one point Meg discovers that her client didn’t actually buy the house but inherited it (from a previously unknown 19th century relative who had entrusted it to some solicitors). But that has no bearing at all on the (for want of a better word) plot. In fact it adds a layer of confusion because it implies the building has been empty for 170 years, which it plainly hasn’t. And if it had been empty since then, what was a 1980s Trimphone doing there? In fact what was any sort of telephone doing there?
Ironically, one of the top-level perks offered as part of the aforementioned Kickstarter campaign was that Nick Willing was, ahem, willing to provide a professional critique of a screenplay written by the donor. Which sounds good except, Jesus, did no-one provide a critique of this screenplay? Would you trust the critical judgement of someone who thought this abstract bunch of disconnected ideas was ready to be filmed? That’s like a chef who has served up a cold, undercooked meal offering his customers cookery lessons.
Anyway, other cast and crew round-up. There’s Stephen Chance who was the vampiric quizmaster in Kill Keith, Richard Dillane who played Werner Von Braun in 2005 drama-doc Space Race, and David J Peel who had a bit part in Stalled. The music is by Simon Boswell who scored much of Willing’s other work, as well as some crap like Octane and Incubus (plus, famously, some Argento stuff). Top Danish DP Jan Richter-Friis (Wire in the Blood, Powers) lit the film, which was cut by editor David Freeman (The Full Monty). Production designer John Ellis mostly works on Springwatch and Autumnwatch, not the sort of shows you would expect to use a production designer. John Lindlar (White Settlers) designed the costumes; visual effects were supervised by Ben Ashmore (Love Bite, The Harry Hill Movie). A bunch of talented people doing their best, I have no doubt, but as so often happens, the whole thing rests on the script - which, by any standards, is just a jumble of unconnected ideas. And thus the whole edifice crumbles.
Without some structure and some sense of why – why is this particular spooky thing happening to this person at this time? – a ghost story stops being a ghost story and becomes simply a ghost train. And that’s what we’ve got here. Which is a shame.
At time of writing a British disc from RLJ Entertainment (as The Haunting of...) is listed on Amazon for release in December 2015. Presumably the twelve-month delay indicates that Channel 5 have the rights for a year in case they want to repeat this. It's not because the film, which takes place in the summer, has any connection with Christmas.
MJS rating: C
Writer: Nick Willing
Producer: Michele Camarda
Cast: Olivia Williams, Matthew Modine, Antonia Clarke
Country: UK
Year of release: 2014
Reviewed from: TV screening
The Haunting of Radcliffe House is a curious film with an interesting history, and no-one else seems bothered about reviewing it so I guess it’s up to Muggins here. The film has its good points and its bad points. It’s not as awful as one might suppose from reading user reviews on the IMDB but nor is it as good as it could (or should) have been.
Olivia Williams (X-Men 3, Last Days on Mars) and token Yank Matthew Modine are Meg and Alec, a London couple who move into a vast, empty mansion on the Yorkshire moors. Meg has got the job of restoring this pile for an American client who has recently purchased it. Alec is an artist whose style mostly involves welding square lumps of metal together; he can use part of the building as a workshop. Also moving in are teenage daughter Penny (Antonia Clarke: The Thirteenth Tale) and not-quite-teen son Harper (Adam Thomas Wright: The Awakening).
Locals believe the house to be haunted, or cursed, or something. Local builder Donnelly (Jonathan Jaynes) agrees to help Meg with the fixer-upping but leaves when they discover an occult painting on the floor of a curious, slightly pyramidal room somewhere up on the top floor.
Fairly swiftly, spooky stuff starts happening. Penny receives a genuinely frightening visit from a ghost woman who runs towards her as the girl lies in bed, frozen with fear. Alec cuts himself on a nail and a drop of his blood is absorbed by the house. He starts making artistic sketches of a woman who may or may not be supposed to be Meg, and becomes increasingly obsessed with the artistic possibilities of blood. A ‘ghost whisperer’ (Sightseers’ Steve Oram) contacted online by Penny visits briefly and has psychic flashbacks to an accident involving a garden ornament that was broken but has been restored to its former location.
The good thing about The Haunting of Radcliffe House is that many of the scary bits are genuinely scary. Unlike the mediocre, over-rated Woman in Black (which seems to have kickstarted a renaissance in British ghost films) this does not rely on cheap cat scares. The ghost here is much more frightening than Hammer’s because it doesn’t just lunge screaming at the camera on a regular basis.
Where the film falls down however – and it’s a big tumble – is that there is no logic or coherence to any of the supernatural shenanigans on display. It’s like writer-director Nick Willing just got carried away when writing the script – ooh, and then this scary thing happens, then this – quite forgetting that he was supposed to be crafting a coherent narrative. In a way, that actually helps because each new scare is unexpected and, in its novelty, adds another layer of fright. Something you don’t get if each new scare is the same as the last. But that is offset by the completely random nature of what we see. In the third act for example, Penny gets trapped in a network of previously unmentioned cellars and is stalked by something human running fast on all fours, which is never explained. A little later, Penny and Harper find themselves out on the moors where they come across an artist’s easel with a painting of them, dressed exactly as they currently are. That’s spooky, I’ll grant you, but it doesn’t relate to anything before or after.
The activities of a ghost in a ghost story need to serve a purpose: a warning, or a cry for help, or a lamentation. The underlying story here is that the owner of Radcliffe House in the mid-19th century was an artist who murdered his wife, and was also a ‘Rosicrucian’ (though quite what that means in this context is neither explored nor explained). But there also seems to have been an accidental death of someone else falling from an upstairs window onto the garden ornament. The ghost of this person turns up in dayight although it only later becomes clear to us and Meg that this was indeed a Victorian ghost, despite wearing modern clothes.
There’s just no clear story here. The ghost’s activities and motivation are all over the place. There’s some talk of transferral of souls and Alec is clearly possessed by something. I think he is under the spell of the former owner (presumably as a result of that minor accident with a nail) and is trying to somehow transfer his dead wife’s soul into Meg. But why would he want to do that if he killed her in the first place? And where does this other ghost fit into it all? The whole thing is just a random grab-bag of (admittedly effective) spookiness masquerading as a (thoroughly unsatisfying) story.
Matters are not helped by some careless lack of attention to detail. At one point a phone in a room full of clutter starts ringing, although we know that the engineer who was supposed to reconnect the phone didn’t turn up. Spooky. Problem is: the phone is very clearly a 1980s Trimphone which is completely out of context with the other junk. More to the point, the foley artist on this film is presumably not old enough to remember Trimphones and their very, very distinctive sound so has added a standard ‘telephone ring’ sound effect. I don’t care if the caller is some spirit using an unplugged phone: either use a Trimphone sound or a pre-1980s phone prop. (While I’m being pedantic, there’s a scene where Harper and Jenny play Cluedo, which you can’t actually do with just two people.)
Eventually Meg is left lying on the painting underneath a weird, heavy, hanging metal thing that drips blood onto her. There is no explanation or context for this metal thing and, apart from hoping that it won’t pull its rusty bracket from the ceiling and squish the woman’s head, there’s very little reason to feel any concern, empathy or involvement in this scene.
And then there’s the ‘twist’ ending of the film. This is so bad, so unnecessary, so clichéed, so ineptly, unsubtly handled, and generally so stupid that it completely ruins the whole movie, hammering the final nail into something which up to then had been merely ‘not very good’.
The motive force behind The Haunting of Radcliffe House were married couple writer-director Nick Willing and producer Michele Camarda, whose previous BHR entry was 2002 misfire Doctor Sleep aka Hypnotic aka Close Your Eyes. Willing has also directed several mini-series for Hallmark, the two head honchos of which, Robert Halmi Sr and Jr, are credited here as executive producers. But this is a long way from a lavish Hallmark production, being principally funded by Screen Yorkshire. Presumably that funding body was keen to include as many establishing shots of tourist-friendly moorland as possible, and to overlook the film’s underlying message which is: stay away from Yorkshire, our ghosts will try to kill you and your children.
The film was shot in early 2014 under the half-hearted and pointless title Altar. There are a couple of mentions of an altar but there isn’t actually an altar in the film, unless that term refers to the circular floor painting, which isn’t any sort of altar that I would recognise. This was supposedly made with expectation of a theatrical release, but only in the sense that every film bullshits that line. Realistically, Altar was always going to be a straight-to-DVD picture – and hey, there’s no sin in that. But what actually happened was that Channel 5 bought the UK rights, improved the title considerably by changing it to The Haunting of Radcliffe House, and screened the film on terrestrial TV a couple of days after Christmas 2014.
In September that year a Kickstarter campaign was launched, presumably by Willing and Camarda, to raise $40,000 to pay for the film (as Altar) to get a theatrical release in the States. Despite reaching its target in under two months, it’s not clear what that money will pay for because at time of writing (mid-January 2015) the film was still listed on Amazon for a US DVD release in mid-Feb (through a distributor called Cinedigm, and with a truly abysmal sleeve). In any case, even if the film does get to play US theatres I can't see it getting a better response from audiences than it got on British TV.
Willing and Camarda don’t seem to have much luck with distribution. Thirteen years on, Doctor Sleep remains solidly unreleased in the UK under any of its varied titles, Amazon.co.uk offering only American, German and Danish discs. More to the point, one can’t help thinking that if savvy, successful film businessmen like Halmi pere et fils don’t think that a movie is worth backing as a theatrical release, then it’s probably not a sound investment on the part of crowdfunders, most of whom are presumably just really big fans of Modine or Williams.
Reading through the various comments on the IMDB of those who watched Radcliffe House over Christmas, there are numerous accusations of plagiarism: everything from The Shining to The Woman in Black (hey, I just got it: 'Radcliffe' House...) to Hellraiser. Truth be told, I don’t believe Willing set out to deliberately ape well-known horror movies, rather I suspect this is just a side effect of the film’s lack of originality. In randomly bolting together a whole pile of horror film clichés, devoid of the narrative context that might justify them, he has created an effective ‘greatest hits’ package of the genre. And it is natural that in making individual comparisons, the original and/or best known examples of each idea will spring to mind. So yes, a father takes his family to a remote building and then goes nuts but I don’t think Willing watched The Shining and went, “Yes, that’s what I’ll do.” More likely his thought process was: “Lots of horror films feature someone going nuts and threatening their family, often in an isolated setting – that will do me.”
One comparison that is worthy of note – and must be deliberate - is that the film’s basic premise is apparently very similar to ‘The Prayer Tree’, the two-part story which constituted Season 4 of BBC paranormal series Sea of Souls. “When a young couple, Karen and Ian O'Rourke, move into an old home they discover unique symbols painted on the walls. When they post the image on the Internet, Dr. Douglas Monaghan believes they have found the Tree of Life, a symbol of the Order of the Golden Dawn, a 19th century spiritualist group.” - is how the IMDB sums that up.
‘The Prayer Tree’ was written, like most Sea of Souls episodes, by David Kane. Nick Willing directed two episodes in the first season of that series, and Kane wrote the screenplay for Willing’s 2006 Anglo-Canadian thriller The River King. According to the IMDB he also gets a ‘thank you’ on Doctor Sleep. So clearly there is some connection there, but what it is I couldn’t say (and, truth be told, don’t really care).
Perhaps if Kane had written the script for Altar the film might have actually had a plot that made sense. As it is, Willing’s direction is pretty good and he uses a lot of different effects to create his spooky atmosphere, plus the cast are generally fine with particularly impressive performances from Clarke and Knight, but none of this can save the film from its fundamental problem which is simply incoherence and randomness. Things are just thrown into the mix for no reason and to no effect.
For example, at one point Meg discovers that her client didn’t actually buy the house but inherited it (from a previously unknown 19th century relative who had entrusted it to some solicitors). But that has no bearing at all on the (for want of a better word) plot. In fact it adds a layer of confusion because it implies the building has been empty for 170 years, which it plainly hasn’t. And if it had been empty since then, what was a 1980s Trimphone doing there? In fact what was any sort of telephone doing there?Ironically, one of the top-level perks offered as part of the aforementioned Kickstarter campaign was that Nick Willing was, ahem, willing to provide a professional critique of a screenplay written by the donor. Which sounds good except, Jesus, did no-one provide a critique of this screenplay? Would you trust the critical judgement of someone who thought this abstract bunch of disconnected ideas was ready to be filmed? That’s like a chef who has served up a cold, undercooked meal offering his customers cookery lessons.
Anyway, other cast and crew round-up. There’s Stephen Chance who was the vampiric quizmaster in Kill Keith, Richard Dillane who played Werner Von Braun in 2005 drama-doc Space Race, and David J Peel who had a bit part in Stalled. The music is by Simon Boswell who scored much of Willing’s other work, as well as some crap like Octane and Incubus (plus, famously, some Argento stuff). Top Danish DP Jan Richter-Friis (Wire in the Blood, Powers) lit the film, which was cut by editor David Freeman (The Full Monty). Production designer John Ellis mostly works on Springwatch and Autumnwatch, not the sort of shows you would expect to use a production designer. John Lindlar (White Settlers) designed the costumes; visual effects were supervised by Ben Ashmore (Love Bite, The Harry Hill Movie). A bunch of talented people doing their best, I have no doubt, but as so often happens, the whole thing rests on the script - which, by any standards, is just a jumble of unconnected ideas. And thus the whole edifice crumbles.
Without some structure and some sense of why – why is this particular spooky thing happening to this person at this time? – a ghost story stops being a ghost story and becomes simply a ghost train. And that’s what we’ve got here. Which is a shame.
At time of writing a British disc from RLJ Entertainment (as The Haunting of...) is listed on Amazon for release in December 2015. Presumably the twelve-month delay indicates that Channel 5 have the rights for a year in case they want to repeat this. It's not because the film, which takes place in the summer, has any connection with Christmas.
MJS rating: C
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
interview: Coz Greenop
This email interview with Coz Greenop, director of terrific ghost story Wandering Rose, was conducted in January 2015.
What was your aim with Wandering Rose and to what extent do you think the finished film achieves that?
"For me Wandering Rose was always going to be my calling card to get the attention of producers and financiers. I never imagined it would be having a worldwide release on VOD and DVD let alone even sell it. It was always my intention to make something I could show people and also just for me to see if I could achieve making a feature. So many people advised me against making a feature and rather just making a short film due to the budget I had for the film. So for me just to have completed a feature film was always my biggest goal. Everything after that has been a bonus. I never imagined the film would be sold let alone win awards and be received so well."
To what extent did you intend the ‘haunting’ to be supernatural or psychological or ambiguous?
How important are the locations – and the way they are photographed - to the movie?
How has Wandering Rose been received so far by audiences and critics?
I must admit that my heart sank when I saw the title/sleeve for the American release. What are your thoughts on them?
What are you working on next?
What was your aim with Wandering Rose and to what extent do you think the finished film achieves that?
"For me Wandering Rose was always going to be my calling card to get the attention of producers and financiers. I never imagined it would be having a worldwide release on VOD and DVD let alone even sell it. It was always my intention to make something I could show people and also just for me to see if I could achieve making a feature. So many people advised me against making a feature and rather just making a short film due to the budget I had for the film. So for me just to have completed a feature film was always my biggest goal. Everything after that has been a bonus. I never imagined the film would be sold let alone win awards and be received so well."
To what extent did you intend the ‘haunting’ to be supernatural or psychological or ambiguous?
"I always wanted the film to be ambiguous. I am a big fan of Korean horror films. They don’t spell it out for an audience. They make you think about what’s going on. I always wanted the audience to come up with their own interpretation of what the Figure was in Wandering Rose. I also think that what ever the audience make of it, it works. The film is more about the downfall of a girl’s mental state so it can really be interpreted either way. I like the fact that it can shock people but also it has a much deeper meaning rather than being there purely for scares."
How important are the locations – and the way they are photographed - to the movie?
"The whole reason we shot in the Scottish Highlands was because of the haunting landscapes. I love the fact that the couple are in the vast Cairngorm mountains and yet feel so enclosed in the camper van. The mountains almost become a prison, they are trapped, isolated with no escape. The atmospheric landscape also helps us with Rose’s mental state. She feels so trapped. The reason we spent a third of our budget on aerial shots is because I wanted to show the landscape off. The Cairngorms are so stunning I had to show that in the best possible way."
"So far we have had mainly positive reviews from critics. I think the critics that get what we were trying to achieve have really got on board with the film but because there aren’t as many jump scares and the film is quite ambiguous some critics just haven’t got what we were trying to do which is fair enough as I know our film isn’t going to attract an audience who just want gore and scares, but we were never trying to achieve that. I think our film is trying to do more than that. To be put in UK Horror Scene top films of 2014 was a massive honor. We never could have imagined that we would get that kind of response so, so far we have been really blessed with the feedback we have had."
I must admit that my heart sank when I saw the title/sleeve for the American release. What are your thoughts on them?
"When I first heard that the name of the film had been changed to Demon Baby for American audiences I was a little taken back. Not really knowing anything really about the selling of a film and that side of the industry I was quite shocked but I also know that I have to put faith in the distribution company. At the end of the day as a storyteller I want as many people to see my film as possible and if this title appeals to more people then I can’t really complain. The title isn’t as subtle and is very much in your face but if it makes people buy the DVD then its something I can get over. ‘A Rose by any other name would smell as sweet,’ I keep telling myself and hopefully people will look past the title. It will always be Wandering Rose to me and the cast and crew. Hopefully with my next film I will be able to have more of a say in the title."
"I’m currently attached to direct a WW2 feature shot in Norway this Summer called The Border Guide and I’m also on a fourth draft of another psychological horror film called The Passing Beacon that I’m seeking finance for and wanting to shoot early 2016."
website: www.wanderingrosemovie.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















