Writer: Beverly Beaton
Producer: Stephanie Beaton
Cast: Stephanie Beaton, Paul Zanone, Katrina McCullough
Country: USA
Year of release: 2002
Reviewed from: UK disc (Hardgore)
Website: www.stephaniebeaton.com/silvermoon.htm
I met Stephanie Beaton about ten years ago on the set of Elisar Cabrera’s film Witchcraft X: Mistress of the Craft. I found her to be a very nice lady and we have exchanged the occasional e-mail since then. I knew that in 2002 she launched her own production company, Silver Moon Productions, with a low-budget horror film called The Bagman. I didn’t know that the film was released in the UK in 2005 on the Hardgore label.
Well now I’ve finally had a chance to watch The Bagman and I always try to find something positive to say about films made by my friends, but in my heart of hearts I have to admit that this is ... not good. Sorry Steph. The acting is wooden, the script (by Steph’s mum) is clichéed, the direction is flat, the sound is awful, the production values are threadbare and some specific aspects of the film are just head-scratchingly poor. Oh, I feel awful about this, I do.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80f23/80f23f42de92d9a3c7868bcf4ac7633c56c5a7f3" alt=""
The ‘kid’ they’re chasing, Jack Marshall, has some sort of hideous, deformed face which is not explained until much, much later in the movie. Ringleader Randy somehow corners him at a very shallow stream where Kirk, Margaret and Token Black Guy Henry urge him on but Sue tells him to stop. Jack struggles and scratches Randy’s cheek (raising two serious red gashes - boy, he’s got some fingernails on him). Enraged, Randy does what anyone would do in that situation. He produces from somewhere a small hessian sack with a sad mouth painted on it, sticks it over Jack’s head, ties some string loosely round the bag and pushes the other boy’s face into an inch or two of water - while Kirk, Margaret and TBG Henry stare in mute shock and Sue screams frantically but makes no attempt to intervene. Eventually Jack’s body goes limp and drifts away along the shallow brook. Randy actually pisses on the dead boy and then swears everyone to silence, insisting that by not stopping him they are all complicit in the murder.
Flash forward ten years and Sue (Beaton) is living with struggling artist boyfriend Matt (Brent McEwan: Shallow Ground), who shags her, rather dangerously, on a gas cooker. Fortunately for Steph’s arse, the hob-ring that accidentally lights is not the one she’s sitting on. But they subsequently have an argument and Sue leaves. She actually returns to her home town, which she left five months earlier, but we only find this out much later so for all we know she could have just moved next door, especially as her new house looks identical to the one she was sharing with Matt.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2747b/2747b4f0f199fd46e9176c5367289a2cbe2792e8" alt=""
Sue doesn’t like scary movies - or scary anything - so she declines to join her pals for the horror film evening. Thoughtful Margaret (Katrina McCullough) gets round this by breaking into Sue’s house dressed as the Bagman and scaring her into a feint. Yes, she’s dressed exactly like the psycho that nobody has yet seen or heard of, except with the sad-face sack instead of the smiley one. Okay, yes, last time they all saw Jack Marshall he had a sack over his head but he also had a red school jumper and black school trousers. How does Margaret know that he now - if he is somehow still alive - wears a check shirt and light brown trousers?
Sue calls the police to say she can hear an intruder and they tell her to leave the house so she opens the door - and walks straight into a terrifying (well, no, frankly silly) figure who looks vaguely like the boy that her friend murdered and urinated on a decade earlier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f3c/47f3c70c98e22521c854faf69747d008dc36c092" alt=""
So Sue settles down to watch some unspecified horror movies with Kirk, Margaret, Steve and Tonya. Henry’s not there because he’s dead and Randy (Paul Zanone who subsequently co-wrote Evil in the Bayou and Tales from the Grave for/with Steph) is also absent for no apparent reason (in an entirely pointless sequence later we see him picking up an obvious transvestite in a bar, taking him/her home then kicking him/her out when the truth becomes evident). When Kirk, Margaret and Sue go to the store for some more popcorn, Steve and Tonya head upstairs for some sexy fun but they are gruesomely despatched by the ‘Bagman’ (as the character is never called). Wait a minute - they weren’t even in the prologue so why is he killing them?
The other three return to find a note saying that Steve and Tonya have gone to the cemetery. Oh yes, a night in the cemetery was the second part of this fun evening that nervous, sensitive Sue agreed to when she realised that the terrifying kidnap ordeal through which her friends had put her was just a joke.
Anyway, yada yada yada, Margaret and Kirk fall victim to the Bagman and Sue confronts Randy who admits that he was responsible for the fire that mutilated Jack Marshall and killed Jack’s mother all those years ago - a revelation that has no impact whatsoever because this is the first mention of any such fire. It’s something to do with Jack being his half-brother or stepbrother or something and the film ends with Randy killed and then Jack locking himself in a shed and setting fire to the place as Sue stands outside crying. To be honest, what little plot exists in The Bagman pretty much falls apart towards the end, and then it all just stops without any sense of redemption or salvation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/801f0/801f0071fc38a12b92a1cc059011d08bd43e523a" alt=""
Characterisation in The Bagman is wafer-thin where it exists at all. Margaret is shrill, Randy is a slimeball, Henry is black. That’s about it. The plot, such as it is, is an nth generation clone of Friday the 13th, devoid of interest, tension or suspense thanks to bland direction, risible dialogue and stiff acting. But even worse than the film’s artistic shortcomings are the technical ones. Shot on cheap video with flat lighting and dreadful audio (which sounds like it was recorded using the camera mic although three different boom operators are credited), the whole thing looks appallingly amateur. It was obviously shot in people’s real houses and you know, there’s nothing wrong with filming in your own home as long as you dress that home up a bit to look like it belongs to one of your characters. Otherwise, you are just shooting, literally, a home movie.
Steph, who is credited as both producer and executive producer, has made four subsequent films through her company Silver Moon Productions: Evil in the Bayou, Bloody Bender’s Return and a brace of anthology pictures, Tales from the Grave and Tales from the Grave Volume 2: Happy Holidays. Acting roles for other people during the last few years have included Tortured Soul 3 and Blood Gnome, bringing her filmography to more than thirty pictures in ten years. Beverly Beaton helped her daughter on all five Silver Moon films in one capacity or another - writing, acting, costumes etc - and sadly passed away in 2006, one day short of her 68th birthday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dc5e/7dc5e940c42cb0ed167f09c9780904453b7dbce0" alt=""
This film’s director, Rae Fitzpatrick, has no other credits and is a pseudonym (or possibly the real name) of one of the participants - but as his/her true identity has never been revealed, I’ll maintain the secrecy in this review.
Actually, I should pause here to mention one extraordinary shot. After Sue feints at the sight of the ‘fake’ Bagman, Margaret pulls the sack off her head to reveal her identity to the audience and that shot is Completely Out Of Focus. It’s quite important to the story, if not actually vital to the plot, but the shot is just... blurred. It’s unbelievable. Did Lasher, Beaton et al not notice or not care? Sorry folks but that’s way beyond dodgy sound or shift-the-sofa-this-way set dressing. That’s embarrassing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04102/0410293793007d7b5763c35bfd04050fdb1922a0" alt=""
Parts of this film are truly silly but the whole thing is played completely straight and perhaps that’s the biggest flaw. A little nod or wink to the audience to let them know that it’s all a lot of fun might have taken the curse off some of the unavoidable (and, truth be told, avoidable) problems. I’m all for serious horror movies, Lord knows far too many are just scary comedies, but straight-faced horror needs the production values - and, crucially, the script - to make sure that the audience have nothing to laugh at. I’m afraid that The Bagman falls down on both counts.
I wanted to see The Bagman. I was really pleased to find a copy and I shuffled it straight to the top of the To Be Watched pile. But oh dear, it’s not good, not good at all. I’m sure Steph has learned from making this film and I trust that the subsequent Silver Moon pictures are each progressively better. This one, I think, is best forgotten.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce35b/ce35b5bb5bb1a5e1cec116e6a69343958dd6ddbe" alt=""
It has to be said, sadly, that some of these trailers are better made and more entertaining than The Bagman itself. It is also worth commenting on the Hardgore sleeve which prominently bills the star as “Stephanie ‘Witchcraft X’ Beaton” as if that might make any difference. Did they realise that Witchcraft X, although it was shot in London, has never been released in the UK and has almost certainly never been seen by anyone in this country who doesn’t know Elisar Cabrera personally?
MJS rating: D
Review originally posted 3rd October 2007
"The Bagman" to film, który łączy elementy thrillera z kryminałem, oferując zagadkę z nieoczekiwanym zakończeniem. Fabuła skupia się na mężczyźnie, który zostaje uwikłany w tajemniczą sytuację związana z tajemniczą torbą. Choć film ma interesującą fabułę, nie wszystkim przypadł do gustu, ponieważ jego tempo i rozwój fabuły mogą wydawać się zbyt wolne. Warto obejrzeć, jeśli lubi się filmy o napięciu, ale nie należy spodziewać się wielkich emocji przez cały czas.
ReplyDelete